Immigrants from Philippines vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,073,601 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Philippines communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.247. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Philippines within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Philippines corresponds to an increase of 11.2 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($93,899 compared to $70,539, a difference of 33.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,471 compared to $83,943, a difference of 29.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,910 compared to $80,005, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 1.2%), median female earnings ($41,114 compared to $35,003, a difference of 17.5%), and median earnings ($48,266 compared to $40,287, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 59.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.7% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 55.4%), and single male poverty (10.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 50.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 9.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 77.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 37.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 24.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 40.1%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 31.0%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.37 compared to 3.20, a difference of 5.4%), family households with children (29.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and currently married (47.6% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 12.9%), no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.91%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 57.6%), bachelor's degree (36.4% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 19.2%), and master's degree (13.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.44%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 61.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 45.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.71%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 8.2%).