Immigrants from Caribbean vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 187,168,104 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Caribbean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.007. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Caribbean within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Caribbean corresponds to an increase of 0.4 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.4% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 22.5%), householder income over 65 years ($48,535 compared to $53,847, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,757 compared to $47,015, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($46,193 compared to $46,368, a difference of 0.38%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,326 compared to $80,005, a difference of 0.40%), and per capita income ($37,254 compared to $36,631, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 39.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 36.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (20.7% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.25%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and female poverty (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 61.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 23.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.2% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 40.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 21.9%), births to unmarried women (39.8% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and family households (65.3% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.1%), divorced or separated (13.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and married-couple households (40.8% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 107.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 70.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 47.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (80.4% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 12.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 29.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 47.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 77.7%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 19.0%), and college, under 1 year (56.6% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 61.6%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 54.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.14%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.70%), and cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 3.1%).