White/Caucasian vs Chippewa Community Comparison
COMPARE
White/Caucasian
Chippewa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Whites/Caucasians
Chippewa
5,140
SOCIAL INDEX
48.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
185th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chippewa Integration in White/Caucasian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,055,443 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within White/Caucasian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.257. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Whites/Caucasians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Whites/Caucasians corresponds to a decrease of 19.7 Chippewa.
White/Caucasian vs Chippewa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,091 compared to $83,943, a difference of 16.9%), median male earnings ($53,925 compared to $46,368, a difference of 16.3%), and median household income ($82,029 compared to $70,539, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,336 compared to $47,015, a difference of 7.1%), median female earnings ($37,531 compared to $35,003, a difference of 7.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,847 compared to $53,847, a difference of 9.3%).
Income Metric | White/Caucasian | Chippewa |
Per Capita Income | Poor $42,180 | Tragic $36,631 |
Median Family Income | Poor $99,800 | Tragic $86,852 |
Median Household Income | Poor $82,029 | Tragic $70,539 |
Median Earnings | Poor $45,197 | Tragic $40,287 |
Median Male Earnings | Fair $53,925 | Tragic $46,368 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,531 | Tragic $35,003 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,336 | Tragic $47,015 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $91,668 | Tragic $80,005 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $98,091 | Tragic $83,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,847 | Tragic $53,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.5% | Excellent 25.0% |
White/Caucasian vs Chippewa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 32.7%), male poverty (11.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 31.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.1% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.5%), single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 11.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.8%).
Poverty Metric | White/Caucasian | Chippewa |
Poverty | Average 12.3% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Average 11.1% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Average 13.4% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Poor 18.1% | Tragic 23.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Average 16.2% | Tragic 20.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.5% | Tragic 21.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Average 16.6% | Tragic 20.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 16.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 26.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.2% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.1% | Tragic 14.7% |
White/Caucasian vs Chippewa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 59.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 36.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.4%).
Unemployment Metric | White/Caucasian | Chippewa |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Poor 6.9% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Good 4.6% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 5.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.4% | Tragic 13.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 11.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
White/Caucasian vs Chippewa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.76%).
Labor Participation Metric | White/Caucasian | Chippewa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.6% | Tragic 63.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.5% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.3% | Exceptional 43.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.9% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.9% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.6% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 81.3% |
White/Caucasian vs Chippewa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 30.6%), single father households (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 29.3%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 4.3%).
Family Structure Metric | White/Caucasian | Chippewa |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.1% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.6% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.14 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.6% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.3% | Tragic 42.6% |
White/Caucasian vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 34.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 2.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | White/Caucasian | Chippewa |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 93.1% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.8% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.6% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.6% |
White/Caucasian vs Chippewa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (13.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 21.0%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 17.5%), and bachelor's degree (35.3% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%).
Education Level Metric | White/Caucasian | Chippewa |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.8% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.3% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 91.8% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.1% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.2% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.0% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.6% | Tragic 55.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 44.2% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.3% | Tragic 30.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Poor 4.1% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.5% |
White/Caucasian vs Chippewa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 18.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 17.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.3%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.4%).
Disability Metric | White/Caucasian | Chippewa |
Disability | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.6% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.2% | Tragic 27.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.3% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 17.0% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |