Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chippewa Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Bahamas
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Bahamas

Chippewa

Tragic
Fair
1,107
SOCIAL INDEX
8.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
322nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chippewa Integration in Immigrants from Bahamas Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,864,295 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Bahamas communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.223. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bahamas within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.046% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bahamas corresponds to a decrease of 46.2 Chippewa.
Immigrants from Bahamas Integration in Chippewa Communities

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chippewa Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 18.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($76,910 compared to $80,005, a difference of 4.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,793 compared to $47,015, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,027 compared to $35,003, a difference of 0.070%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,177 compared to $83,943, a difference of 0.92%), and median earnings ($39,861 compared to $40,287, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chippewa Income
Income MetricImmigrants from BahamasChippewa
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,193
Tragic
$36,631
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,732
Tragic
$86,852
Median Household Income
Tragic
$71,349
Tragic
$70,539
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,861
Tragic
$40,287
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$45,176
Tragic
$46,368
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,027
Tragic
$35,003
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,793
Tragic
$47,015
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$76,910
Tragic
$80,005
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,177
Tragic
$83,943
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,174
Tragic
$53,847
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.1%
Excellent
25.0%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chippewa Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 21.2%), single female poverty (22.5% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 19.4%), and married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.86%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 2.4%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chippewa Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from BahamasChippewa
Poverty
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
15.7%
Families
Tragic
11.1%
Tragic
11.2%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
16.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.4%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.3%
Tragic
18.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
23.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
20.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
21.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.4%
Tragic
20.6%
Single Males
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
16.4%
Single Females
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
26.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.1%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.2%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
12.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
13.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
14.7%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chippewa Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 38.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 32.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and female unemployment (5.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 4.2%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chippewa Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from BahamasChippewa
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
13.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.4%
Poor
18.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.9%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.8%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.6%
Tragic
13.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.1%
Tragic
11.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
7.0%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chippewa Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 23.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.83%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chippewa Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from BahamasChippewa
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.0%
Tragic
63.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.2%
Tragic
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.5%
Exceptional
43.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.2%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.6%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Tragic
81.3%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chippewa Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 27.2%), births to unmarried women (40.1% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 6.3%), and divorced or separated (13.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.12%), married-couple households (41.7% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (26.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.6%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chippewa Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from BahamasChippewa
Family Households
Tragic
63.6%
Tragic
62.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.3%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.7%
Tragic
42.1%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Tragic
3.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
8.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.9%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
40.1%
Tragic
42.6%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 44.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 23.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.51%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 9.0%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from BahamasChippewa
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Exceptional
90.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.5%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
7.6%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chippewa Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 36.6%), master's degree (12.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.0%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.73%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.75%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.76%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chippewa Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from BahamasChippewa
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Poor
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Poor
97.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Fair
95.9%
Exceptional
97.3%
8th Grade
Poor
95.5%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Poor
94.6%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.2%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Excellent
89.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.2%
Fair
85.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.1%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.2%
Tragic
55.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.1%
Tragic
40.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.3%
Tragic
30.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chippewa Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 50.9%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 38.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.42%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.63%), and disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chippewa Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from BahamasChippewa
Disability
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
14.1%
Males
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
14.3%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Average
1.2%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Average
6.6%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.7%
Tragic
27.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.7%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
4.0%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%