Filipino vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,322,343 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Filipino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Filipinos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Filipinos corresponds to an increase of 2.1 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Filipino and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($115,509 compared to $70,539, a difference of 63.7%), per capita income ($59,066 compared to $36,631, a difference of 61.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,723 compared to $80,005, a difference of 60.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 18.9%), householder income under 25 years ($57,740 compared to $47,015, a difference of 22.8%), and median female earnings ($49,508 compared to $35,003, a difference of 41.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Filipino and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (11.6% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 101.6%), receiving food stamps (7.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 98.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 88.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 14.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 24.5%), and single father poverty (14.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 34.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Filipino and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 117.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 61.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 54.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Filipino and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.7% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 38.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.4% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Filipino and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 85.5%), single father households (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 71.5%), and single mother households (4.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 69.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.010%), family households (65.9% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Filipino and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 125.3%), professional degree (7.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 118.1%), and master's degree (23.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 105.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.8% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.24%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.45%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 85.9%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 78.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 64.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 6.6%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 10.3%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 22.7%).