Norwegian vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,534,047 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.518. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.043% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to an increase of 43.1 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,682 compared to $83,943, a difference of 23.5%), median family income ($106,144 compared to $86,852, a difference of 22.2%), and median household income ($86,084 compared to $70,539, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,802 compared to $35,003, a difference of 10.8%), householder income under 25 years ($53,127 compared to $47,015, a difference of 13.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,104 compared to $53,847, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 63.9%), family poverty (6.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 63.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.6% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 60.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 18.3%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 22.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 25.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 84.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 59.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 55.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 46.0%), births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 45.3%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.3%), family households (63.9% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.08 compared to 3.20, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 46.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 10.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 3.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 22.9%), bachelor's degree (37.5% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 22.6%), and no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 30.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 25.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.5% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 6.4%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 8.3%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 9.6%).