Argentinean vs Chippewa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Argentinean
Chippewa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Argentineans
Chippewa
8,055
SOCIAL INDEX
78.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
90th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chippewa Integration in Argentinean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,992,497 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.407. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.095% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to an increase of 94.9 Chippewa.
Argentinean vs Chippewa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,862 compared to $36,631, a difference of 36.1%), median household income ($93,960 compared to $70,539, a difference of 33.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,103 compared to $83,943, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 8.1%), householder income under 25 years ($54,154 compared to $47,015, a difference of 15.2%), and median female earnings ($41,952 compared to $35,003, a difference of 19.9%).
Income Metric | Argentinean | Chippewa |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $49,862 | Tragic $36,631 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $112,665 | Tragic $86,852 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,960 | Tragic $70,539 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,399 | Tragic $40,287 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $60,117 | Tragic $46,368 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,952 | Tragic $35,003 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,154 | Tragic $47,015 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $103,111 | Tragic $80,005 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $110,103 | Tragic $83,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,246 | Tragic $53,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.0% | Excellent 25.0% |
Argentinean vs Chippewa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.4% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 52.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 44.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.4% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.0%).
Poverty Metric | Argentinean | Chippewa |
Poverty | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Excellent 8.4% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Excellent 12.8% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.4% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 23.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.6% | Tragic 20.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 21.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 20.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 16.4% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 26.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.8% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.2% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Good 5.1% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 14.7% |
Argentinean vs Chippewa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 84.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 47.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Argentinean | Chippewa |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Fair 5.2% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 11.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
Argentinean vs Chippewa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 31.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Argentinean | Chippewa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.7% | Tragic 63.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.0% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 33.3% | Exceptional 43.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.1% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.6% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.3% | Tragic 81.3% |
Argentinean vs Chippewa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 44.1%), births to unmarried women (30.0% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 42.2%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.81%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (65.0% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Argentinean | Chippewa |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.5% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Good 47.1% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 30.0% | Tragic 42.6% |
Argentinean vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 22.8%), no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 18.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 13.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Argentinean | Chippewa |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.9% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.5% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.9% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Argentinean vs Chippewa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 70.9%), master's degree (18.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 59.2%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 49.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.6% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.060%), high school diploma (89.5% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.31%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.56%).
Education Level Metric | Argentinean | Chippewa |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Fair 97.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Fair 97.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.9% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.5% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.8% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Average 93.7% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Good 92.7% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.6% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.5% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.7% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.4% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 63.2% | Tragic 55.7% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.2% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.3% | Tragic 30.6% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.2% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Argentinean vs Chippewa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 59.5%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 58.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 55.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.9%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 8.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.8%).
Disability Metric | Argentinean | Chippewa |
Disability | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 27.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |