African vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,238,204 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.152. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Africans corresponds to an increase of 2.3 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between African and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 8.9%), median female earnings ($36,530 compared to $35,003, a difference of 4.4%), and median earnings ($41,955 compared to $40,287, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,711 compared to $53,847, a difference of 0.25%), householder income under 25 years ($46,838 compared to $47,015, a difference of 0.38%), and median family income ($87,820 compared to $86,852, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between African and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.8% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 13.5%), single male poverty (14.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 11.1%), and married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (15.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.63%), female poverty (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (22.8% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between African and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 45.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and female unemployment (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between African and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between African and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 26.0%), births to unmarried women (39.7% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 7.3%), and currently married (41.8% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 0.080%), divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.54%), and family households with children (27.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between African and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 30.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 29.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between African and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 33.3%), master's degree (12.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.8%), and bachelor's degree (32.9% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.68%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.68%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between African and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 37.3%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 31.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.88%), ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.1%).