Immigrants from Ghana vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,296,620 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Ghana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.082. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ghana within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ghana corresponds to a decrease of 10.7 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($81,489 compared to $70,539, a difference of 15.5%), median female earnings ($39,894 compared to $35,003, a difference of 14.0%), and median earnings ($45,641 compared to $40,287, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($58,624 compared to $53,847, a difference of 8.9%), householder income under 25 years ($51,333 compared to $47,015, a difference of 9.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($87,760 compared to $80,005, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 26.2%), single female poverty (21.9% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 22.4%), and single male poverty (13.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.6%), receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 60.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 26.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and female unemployment (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 23.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 26.9%), births to unmarried women (34.5% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 23.5%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.10%), married-couple households (41.8% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 0.88%), and currently married (42.7% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 75.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 46.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.4% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 8.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.4% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 20.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 33.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 59.3%), master's degree (15.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 31.3%), and bachelor's degree (36.9% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (63.1% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 0.74%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 55.4%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 54.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.0%).