Lumbee vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,136,702 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Lumbee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.288. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lumbee corresponds to a decrease of 16.3 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($34,584 compared to $47,015, a difference of 35.9%), householder income over 65 years ($40,550 compared to $53,847, a difference of 32.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($60,305 compared to $80,005, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($32,500 compared to $35,003, a difference of 7.7%), median earnings ($36,876 compared to $40,287, a difference of 9.2%), and median male earnings ($41,715 compared to $46,368, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (22.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 56.1%), single male poverty (25.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 53.7%), and married-couple family poverty (8.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.1% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 19.8%), single female poverty (33.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 23.0%), and single mother poverty (43.2% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 24.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 44.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 33.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.86%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 41.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (65.5% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 17.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (56.8% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (78.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (77.3% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.6% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (9.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 14.1%), births to unmarried women (48.2% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 13.1%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (26.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 16.0%), no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 9.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 40.9%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 40.0%), and bachelor's degree (24.8% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 39.5%), vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 38.9%), and ambulatory disability (9.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (4.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 2.9%), cognitive disability (19.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and male disability (15.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 6.7%).