Iroquois vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,841,251 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.164. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.091% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 90.6 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,104 compared to $36,631, a difference of 6.8%), median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $46,368, a difference of 6.5%), and median earnings ($42,430 compared to $40,287, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $53,847, a difference of 0.21%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $47,015, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 13.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 12.9%), and male poverty (13.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 0.24%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 52.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 31.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 18.7%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 0.26%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.3%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 17.1%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 15.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 15.1%), master's degree (12.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.9%), and bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (62.6% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 29.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 13.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.020%), ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and female disability (14.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 0.40%).