Aleut vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,584,529 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Aleut communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.679. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Aleuts within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Aleuts corresponds to an increase of 21.1 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,052 compared to $83,943, a difference of 19.2%), median household income ($83,446 compared to $70,539, a difference of 18.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,708 compared to $53,847, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 5.2%), householder income under 25 years ($50,377 compared to $47,015, a difference of 7.1%), and median earnings ($44,241 compared to $40,287, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in poverty (12.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 25.2%), female poverty (13.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 25.1%), and male poverty (11.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (25.4% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 5.6%), single mother poverty (32.9% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 5.6%), and single male poverty (15.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 77.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 37.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 16.9%), births to unmarried women (39.3% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 8.4%), and married-couple households (45.6% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.94%), single father households (3.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (63.4% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 37.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 10.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 4.3%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.0% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.010%), 4th grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%), and 3rd grade (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 59.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 33.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (28.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age over 75 (50.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and male disability (13.5% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 5.4%).