Immigrants from Peru vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 154,276,631 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Peru communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.076. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Peru within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Peru corresponds to a decrease of 5.1 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($89,010 compared to $70,539, a difference of 26.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,173 compared to $83,943, a difference of 22.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,329 compared to $80,005, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 0.55%), median female earnings ($39,871 compared to $35,003, a difference of 13.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,988 compared to $53,847, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.9% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 53.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 45.3%), and single male poverty (11.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.49%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 77.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 41.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.84%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.2% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 28.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 34.0%), single father households (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 28.8%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.31 compared to 3.20, a difference of 3.5%), currently married (46.4% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 21.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 53.7%), master's degree (14.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 30.6%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (63.1% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 0.84%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 53.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 52.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.3%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.3%).