Arapaho vs Chippewa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Arapaho
Chippewa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Arapaho
Chippewa
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chippewa Integration in Arapaho Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,256,247 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.187. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.069% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 69.4 Chippewa.
Arapaho vs Chippewa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $36,631, a difference of 13.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $80,005, a difference of 11.6%), and median female earnings ($31,489 compared to $35,003, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($67,965 compared to $70,539, a difference of 3.8%), median family income ($82,064 compared to $86,852, a difference of 5.8%), and wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 6.4%).
Income Metric | Arapaho | Chippewa |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $32,345 | Tragic $36,631 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,064 | Tragic $86,852 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $67,965 | Tragic $70,539 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,586 | Tragic $40,287 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $41,758 | Tragic $46,368 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $31,489 | Tragic $35,003 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,003 | Tragic $47,015 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $71,697 | Tragic $80,005 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $75,945 | Tragic $83,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $59,383 | Tragic $53,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.5% | Excellent 25.0% |
Arapaho vs Chippewa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 34.0%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 27.5%), and married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (23.1% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 1.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (20.8% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.4%).
Poverty Metric | Arapaho | Chippewa |
Poverty | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Tragic 17.5% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.2% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.1% | Tragic 23.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 20.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 21.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.7% | Tragic 20.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 16.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.4% | Tragic 26.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 24.0% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.4% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.6% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.6% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 14.7% |
Arapaho vs Chippewa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 97.9%), male unemployment (11.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 67.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 65.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Arapaho | Chippewa |
Unemployment | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.0% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Tragic 8.8% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 25.2% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 10.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.3% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 13.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 11.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 7.0% |
Arapaho vs Chippewa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 17.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (74.4% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Arapaho | Chippewa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.1% | Tragic 63.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 74.4% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.3% | Exceptional 43.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.8% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 76.6% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.5% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 78.1% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.1% | Tragic 81.3% |
Arapaho vs Chippewa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in average family size (3.64 compared to 3.20, a difference of 13.6%), divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 12.6%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (41.8% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 0.77%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 6.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Arapaho | Chippewa |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.5% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.6% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.8% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.64 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 40.5% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 47.1% | Tragic 42.6% |
Arapaho vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 28.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 23.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 22.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Arapaho | Chippewa |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.7% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.2% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 26.4% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Arapaho vs Chippewa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 30.7%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 28.7%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.020%), 2nd grade (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.10%).
Education Level Metric | Arapaho | Chippewa |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.4% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.6% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.8% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.3% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.1% | Tragic 55.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 36.7% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 26.6% | Tragic 30.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.0% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Arapaho vs Chippewa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 50.2%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 47.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.020%), ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 0.66%).
Disability Metric | Arapaho | Chippewa |
Disability | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.1% | Tragic 27.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.8% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |