Osage vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,134,116 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.338. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 4.4 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $46,368, a difference of 8.5%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and per capita income ($39,568 compared to $36,631, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $47,015, a difference of 2.7%), median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $35,003, a difference of 2.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $53,847, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 25.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 19.1%), and male poverty (12.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), single male poverty (16.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.61%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 40.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 31.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.86%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 33.0%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 25.4%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.71%), divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (63.7% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 8.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.80%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 10.1%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 8.8%), and bachelor's degree (33.0% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (55.8% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 0.12%), college, under 1 year (62.7% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (14.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.080%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.5% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.8%).