Immigrants from Guatemala vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,564,545 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to an increase of 2.3 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 11.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $47,015, a difference of 9.4%), and median household income ($75,123 compared to $70,539, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,950 compared to $53,847, a difference of 0.19%), median male earnings ($46,244 compared to $46,368, a difference of 0.27%), and median family income ($87,191 compared to $86,852, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 32.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 24.2%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.22%), poverty (15.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and female poverty (17.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 54.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 29.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 24.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 13.7%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and family households with children (28.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (42.6% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 1.4%), married-couple households (42.8% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 18.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 10.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 118.7%), college, under 1 year (56.2% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 11.4%), and high school diploma (81.4% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (30.8% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 0.65%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 0.72%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 53.5%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 43.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 42.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.4%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.6%).