Tohono O'odham vs Chippewa Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Chippewa

Tragic
Fair
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chippewa Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,555,814 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.937. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.311% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to an increase of 310.6 Chippewa.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Chippewa Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Chippewa Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $36,631, a difference of 21.1%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $86,852, a difference of 20.3%), and median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $46,368, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $47,015, a difference of 3.9%), median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $35,003, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,121 compared to $53,847, a difference of 9.6%).
Tohono O'odham vs Chippewa Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamChippewa
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Tragic
$36,631
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Tragic
$86,852
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Tragic
$70,539
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Tragic
$40,287
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Tragic
$46,368
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Tragic
$35,003
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Tragic
$47,015
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Tragic
$80,005
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Tragic
$83,943
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Tragic
$53,847
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Excellent
25.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Chippewa Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 106.3%), family poverty (20.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 81.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (20.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 71.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 17.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 19.7%), and single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 23.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs Chippewa Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamChippewa
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
15.7%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
11.2%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Tragic
16.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Tragic
18.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Tragic
23.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Tragic
20.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
21.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
20.6%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
16.4%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Tragic
26.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
12.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
13.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
14.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Chippewa Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 58.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 55.6%), and male unemployment (10.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 55.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.0%).
Tohono O'odham vs Chippewa Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamChippewa
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
13.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Poor
18.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
13.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
11.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Tragic
7.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Chippewa Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 40.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 12.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 8.1%).
Tohono O'odham vs Chippewa Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamChippewa
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Tragic
63.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Tragic
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
43.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Tragic
81.3%

Tohono O'odham vs Chippewa Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 23.7%), currently married (36.8% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 17.6%), and births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 4.8%), family households (67.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 9.6%).
Tohono O'odham vs Chippewa Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamChippewa
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
62.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Tragic
42.1%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
3.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
8.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Tragic
42.6%

Tohono O'odham vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 65.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 14.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 7.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 14.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamChippewa
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
90.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
7.6%

Tohono O'odham vs Chippewa Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 41.3%), associate's degree (31.8% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 28.2%), and bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.66%).
Tohono O'odham vs Chippewa Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamChippewa
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
97.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Excellent
89.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Fair
85.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Tragic
55.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Tragic
40.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
30.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%

Tohono O'odham vs Chippewa Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 29.6%), ambulatory disability (8.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 23.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (14.6% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 2.3%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and disability (14.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 4.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Chippewa Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamChippewa
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
14.1%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
14.3%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Tragic
27.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
4.0%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.6%