Serbian vs Chippewa Community Comparison

COMPARE

Serbian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Serbians

Chippewa

Excellent
Fair
8,746
SOCIAL INDEX
84.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
53rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chippewa Integration in Serbian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,209,306 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Serbian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.645. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Serbians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.287% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Serbians corresponds to an increase of 287.3 Chippewa.
Serbian Integration in Chippewa Communities

Serbian vs Chippewa Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Serbian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,551 compared to $36,631, a difference of 27.1%), median male earnings ($57,975 compared to $46,368, a difference of 25.0%), and median household income ($87,572 compared to $70,539, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,106 compared to $47,015, a difference of 8.7%), wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 10.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,087 compared to $53,847, a difference of 13.4%).
Serbian vs Chippewa Income
Income MetricSerbianChippewa
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,551
Tragic
$36,631
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$107,157
Tragic
$86,852
Median Household Income
Excellent
$87,572
Tragic
$70,539
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,677
Tragic
$40,287
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,975
Tragic
$46,368
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,539
Tragic
$35,003
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,106
Tragic
$47,015
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$98,320
Tragic
$80,005
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,522
Tragic
$83,943
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,087
Tragic
$53,847
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Excellent
25.0%

Serbian vs Chippewa Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Serbian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (10.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 43.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.3% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 43.2%), and receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 15.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 17.2%), and single mother poverty (28.6% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 21.7%).
Serbian vs Chippewa Poverty
Poverty MetricSerbianChippewa
Poverty
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
15.7%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
11.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
16.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.0%
Tragic
18.0%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.3%
Tragic
23.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
20.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
21.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
20.6%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Tragic
16.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.1%
Tragic
26.8%
Single Fathers
Average
16.4%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.6%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
12.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
13.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
14.7%

Serbian vs Chippewa Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Serbian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 83.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 44.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.7%).
Serbian vs Chippewa Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSerbianChippewa
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
13.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Poor
18.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
13.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Excellent
8.8%
Tragic
11.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.0%

Serbian vs Chippewa Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Serbian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 9.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.6%).
Serbian vs Chippewa Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSerbianChippewa
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Good
65.2%
Tragic
63.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Tragic
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.9%
Exceptional
43.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.3%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.5%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
81.3%

Serbian vs Chippewa Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Serbian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 41.1%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 39.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.5%), family households (63.0% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.12 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.6%).
Serbian vs Chippewa Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSerbianChippewa
Family Households
Tragic
63.0%
Tragic
62.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Good
47.0%
Tragic
42.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.12
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
8.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.8%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Average
12.0%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.7%
Tragic
42.6%

Serbian vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Serbian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 26.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 12.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.0%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.9%).
Serbian vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSerbianChippewa
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Exceptional
90.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.1%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Exceptional
7.6%

Serbian vs Chippewa Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Serbian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 40.7%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 38.7%), and bachelor's degree (40.1% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.0% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.090%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.13%).
Serbian vs Chippewa Education Level
Education Level MetricSerbianChippewa
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
97.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.0%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.1%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.8%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Excellent
89.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.9%
Fair
85.2%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.4%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.4%
Tragic
55.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
40.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.1%
Tragic
30.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.1%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
2.0%
Tragic
1.5%

Serbian vs Chippewa Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Serbian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 44.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 35.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 5.0%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.8%).
Serbian vs Chippewa Disability
Disability MetricSerbianChippewa
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Tragic
14.1%
Males
Poor
11.5%
Tragic
14.3%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.0%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.3%
Tragic
27.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.1%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
4.0%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%