Australian vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 129,518,570 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.229. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.270% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 269.5 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $36,631, a difference of 42.2%), median household income ($96,490 compared to $70,539, a difference of 36.8%), and median family income ($118,440 compared to $86,852, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 12.8%), householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $47,015, a difference of 14.3%), and median female earnings ($43,308 compared to $35,003, a difference of 23.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 52.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 51.0%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 43.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 13.7%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 19.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 85.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 46.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 44.3%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 43.2%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.64%), family households (62.8% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 15.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.71%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 0.91%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 69.8%), master's degree (18.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 61.1%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 57.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.0% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 39.2%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 36.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 5.4%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 6.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.9%).