Maltese vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,788,858 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Maltese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.116. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Maltese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.032% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Maltese corresponds to an increase of 31.7 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Maltese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,064 compared to $80,005, a difference of 37.6%), median household income ($97,015 compared to $70,539, a difference of 37.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,754 compared to $83,943, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,735 compared to $47,015, a difference of 14.3%), wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,027 compared to $53,847, a difference of 22.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Maltese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 64.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 61.2%), and male poverty (9.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 60.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 22.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 26.8%), and single mother poverty (26.6% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 30.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Maltese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 93.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 48.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Maltese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 13.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Maltese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 53.8%), births to unmarried women (27.8% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 53.2%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.010%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (64.7% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Maltese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 13.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.36%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Maltese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 51.2%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 45.2%), and bachelor's degree (41.9% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.11%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Maltese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 41.0%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 39.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 5.6%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 11.4%).