Lithuanian vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 189,543,705 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Lithuanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.906. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.182% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lithuanians corresponds to an increase of 182.1 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,448 compared to $36,631, a difference of 35.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,484 compared to $83,943, a difference of 34.0%), and median household income ($93,852 compared to $70,539, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,552 compared to $47,015, a difference of 13.9%), wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and median female earnings ($42,108 compared to $35,003, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 56.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 54.1%), and male poverty (9.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 52.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 8.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 23.4%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 25.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 72.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 44.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 46.8%), single father households (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 46.5%), and births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.62%), average family size (3.10 compared to 3.20, a difference of 3.1%), and family households (64.0% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 19.7%), no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 12.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 55.4%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 55.2%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.11%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 38.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 30.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 7.4%), cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 11.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.4%).