Immigrants from Sierra Leone vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,561,464 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Sierra Leone communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.258. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sierra Leone within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.053% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sierra Leone corresponds to an increase of 53.5 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sierra Leone and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($88,498 compared to $70,539, a difference of 25.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,227 compared to $83,943, a difference of 23.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,009 compared to $53,847, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,190 compared to $47,015, a difference of 15.3%), median male earnings ($53,905 compared to $46,368, a difference of 16.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,115 compared to $80,005, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sierra Leone and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (19.4% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 38.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 35.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 9.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sierra Leone and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 62.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 26.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.91%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sierra Leone and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 17.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (68.5% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sierra Leone and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 25.8%), births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 24.5%), and family households with children (29.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.8% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 1.3%), married-couple households (43.3% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households (64.3% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sierra Leone and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 23.9%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 20.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sierra Leone and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 50.8%), master's degree (16.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 42.7%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.23%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.7% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.95%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sierra Leone and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 56.6%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 49.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.6%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.4%).