Icelander vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,673,965 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Icelander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.412. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Icelanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.220% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Icelanders corresponds to an increase of 220.4 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Icelander and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,987 compared to $36,631, a difference of 22.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,261 compared to $83,943, a difference of 21.8%), and median household income ($85,797 compared to $70,539, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,247 compared to $47,015, a difference of 9.0%), wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 10.0%), and median female earnings ($39,109 compared to $35,003, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Icelander and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.3% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 43.1%), receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 39.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 11.2%), single mother poverty (29.5% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 17.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Icelander and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 94.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 46.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Icelander and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Icelander and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 40.6%), single father households (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 33.5%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.48%), family households (63.3% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.5%), no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.050%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Icelander and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 38.0%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 35.7%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.6% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.16%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.18%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 55.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 31.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.1%).