Chilean vs Chippewa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chilean
Chippewa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chileans
Chippewa
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chippewa Integration in Chilean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 134,287,686 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.739. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.399% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 399.0 Chippewa.
Chilean vs Chippewa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($90,605 compared to $70,539, a difference of 28.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,611 compared to $83,943, a difference of 27.0%), and per capita income ($46,459 compared to $36,631, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 5.3%), householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $47,015, a difference of 13.1%), and median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $35,003, a difference of 16.4%).
Income Metric | Chilean | Chippewa |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,459 | Tragic $36,631 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,429 | Tragic $86,852 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,605 | Tragic $70,539 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,504 | Tragic $40,287 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,973 | Tragic $46,368 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,757 | Tragic $35,003 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,185 | Tragic $47,015 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $99,900 | Tragic $80,005 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,611 | Tragic $83,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,957 | Tragic $53,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Excellent 25.0% |
Chilean vs Chippewa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 50.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 40.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.0%).
Poverty Metric | Chilean | Chippewa |
Poverty | Excellent 11.8% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Excellent 8.5% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Excellent 12.9% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.6% | Tragic 23.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 20.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 21.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 20.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 16.4% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.9% | Tragic 26.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Excellent 4.9% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.6% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 14.7% |
Chilean vs Chippewa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 85.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 49.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Chilean | Chippewa |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Excellent 8.8% | Tragic 11.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
Chilean vs Chippewa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 22.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chilean | Chippewa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Tragic 63.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.8% | Exceptional 43.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 84.9% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 81.3% |
Chilean vs Chippewa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 39.5%), births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 39.0%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.92%), family households (65.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 5.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Chilean | Chippewa |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.5% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 30.7% | Tragic 42.6% |
Chilean vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 9.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.55%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chilean | Chippewa |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.9% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.2% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.1% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.7% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Chilean vs Chippewa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 51.6%), master's degree (16.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 48.3%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.7% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.15%), high school diploma (89.6% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.17%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.53%).
Education Level Metric | Chilean | Chippewa |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Average 97.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Average 96.0% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Average 95.7% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Good 95.0% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Good 93.9% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Excellent 92.9% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.7% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.6% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.6% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.0% | Tragic 55.7% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.4% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.2% | Tragic 30.6% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Chilean vs Chippewa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 46.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 46.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 42.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.2%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.2%).
Disability Metric | Chilean | Chippewa |
Disability | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.0% | Tragic 27.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.0% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |