Latvian vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 128,476,952 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.681. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.797% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 797.0 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $36,631, a difference of 43.7%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $86,852, a difference of 38.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $83,943, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 11.6%), householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $47,015, a difference of 12.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $53,847, a difference of 25.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 61.4%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 61.0%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 58.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 14.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 20.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 28.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 97.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 55.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 54.1%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 53.7%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.20, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 23.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 11.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.37%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 80.0%), master's degree (19.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 73.5%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 69.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.0%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 47.1%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 43.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 7.3%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 15.2%).