Malaysian vs Chippewa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Malaysian
Chippewa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Malaysians
Chippewa
3,136
SOCIAL INDEX
28.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
232nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chippewa Integration in Malaysian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,485,774 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Malaysian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.428. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Malaysians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.092% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Malaysians corresponds to an increase of 91.9 Chippewa.
Malaysian vs Chippewa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($81,064 compared to $70,539, a difference of 14.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,517 compared to $83,943, a difference of 12.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,291 compared to $80,005, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 0.27%), median female earnings ($37,298 compared to $35,003, a difference of 6.6%), and per capita income ($39,194 compared to $36,631, a difference of 7.0%).
Income Metric | Malaysian | Chippewa |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,194 | Tragic $36,631 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $95,230 | Tragic $86,852 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $81,064 | Tragic $70,539 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,844 | Tragic $40,287 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,772 | Tragic $46,368 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,298 | Tragic $35,003 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,615 | Tragic $47,015 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $88,291 | Tragic $80,005 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $94,517 | Tragic $83,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,244 | Tragic $53,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Excellent 25.0% |
Malaysian vs Chippewa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 30.5%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 29.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.4% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 10.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 12.2%).
Poverty Metric | Malaysian | Chippewa |
Poverty | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Poor 9.6% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 19.9% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 23.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.5% | Tragic 20.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 21.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 20.6% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Tragic 16.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.2% | Tragic 26.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.7% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.4% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.8% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 14.7% |
Malaysian vs Chippewa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 72.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 41.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Malaysian | Chippewa |
Unemployment | Average 5.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.0% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.5% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Poor 8.9% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Tragic 13.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 11.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.5% | Tragic 7.0% |
Malaysian vs Chippewa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Malaysian | Chippewa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.1% | Tragic 63.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.5% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.7% | Exceptional 43.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.2% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.1% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.0% | Tragic 81.3% |
Malaysian vs Chippewa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 25.8%), single father households (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 13.2%), and family households with children (29.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.31 compared to 3.20, a difference of 3.4%), family households (65.9% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and currently married (45.9% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 6.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Malaysian | Chippewa |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.8% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.3% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.31 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.3% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Poor 45.9% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 33.9% | Tragic 42.6% |
Malaysian vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 22.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 4.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Malaysian | Chippewa |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.8% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.6% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Malaysian vs Chippewa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 69.2%), bachelor's degree (32.9% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and master's degree (12.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (55.6% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 0.11%), college, under 1 year (62.2% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 0.70%), and nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.3%).
Education Level Metric | Malaysian | Chippewa |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.5% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.2% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.8% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.2% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.0% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.3% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.2% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.6% | Tragic 55.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.6% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 32.9% | Tragic 30.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Malaysian vs Chippewa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 45.4%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 25.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.2%).
Disability Metric | Malaysian | Chippewa |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Tragic 27.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.0% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |