Cajun vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,248,361 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Cajun communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.526. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cajuns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.435% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cajuns corresponds to an increase of 435.3 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cajun and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (33.9% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 35.6%), median male earnings ($52,325 compared to $46,368, a difference of 12.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,397 compared to $53,847, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($70,605 compared to $70,539, a difference of 0.090%), median family income ($87,157 compared to $86,852, a difference of 0.35%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,015 compared to $83,943, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cajun and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (23.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 22.7%), single male poverty (19.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 16.5%), and single mother poverty (40.3% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (15.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.16%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.7% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 0.86%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cajun and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 45.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (12.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 23.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cajun and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.1% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.46%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cajun and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 25.9%), married-couple households (46.4% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 10.0%), and currently married (47.1% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.84%), divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cajun and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 27.0%), no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 12.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.7% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 0.81%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cajun and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in college, under 1 year (57.3% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 9.2%), associate's degree (37.4% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 9.0%), and college, 1 year or more (51.2% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.15%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.16%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cajun and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 25.5%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 17.1%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (27.9% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.47%), male disability (14.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 0.57%), and disability age 5 to 17 (7.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.96%).