Immigrants vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,101,423 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.525. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants corresponds to a decrease of 2.9 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($85,818 compared to $70,539, a difference of 21.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,943 compared to $83,943, a difference of 19.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,423 compared to $80,005, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 0.59%), householder income over 65 years ($59,656 compared to $53,847, a difference of 10.8%), and median female earnings ($39,328 compared to $35,003, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 34.1%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 29.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.2% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 70.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 36.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 26.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 30.4%), single father households (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 26.0%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.33 compared to 3.20, a difference of 4.0%), currently married (45.8% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and family households (66.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 23.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.69%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 70.5%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 28.2%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (62.5% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 58.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 45.3%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.56%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.1%).