Immigrants from Laos vs Chippewa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Laos
Chippewa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Laos
Chippewa
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chippewa Integration in Immigrants from Laos Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 128,304,449 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.440. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.157% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to an increase of 156.7 Chippewa.
Immigrants from Laos vs Chippewa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($78,327 compared to $70,539, a difference of 11.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,909 compared to $83,943, a difference of 8.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,553 compared to $80,005, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($37,857 compared to $36,631, a difference of 3.4%), wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and median female earnings ($36,841 compared to $35,003, a difference of 5.2%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Chippewa |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,857 | Tragic $36,631 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $92,239 | Tragic $86,852 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $78,327 | Tragic $70,539 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,884 | Tragic $40,287 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,190 | Tragic $46,368 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,841 | Tragic $35,003 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,041 | Tragic $47,015 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $85,553 | Tragic $80,005 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $90,909 | Tragic $83,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,722 | Tragic $53,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.8% | Excellent 25.0% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Chippewa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 25.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 25.5%), and single father poverty (15.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.6%), receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 6.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 9.1%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Chippewa |
Poverty | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.2% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.6% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.4% | Tragic 23.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.7% | Tragic 20.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.7% | Tragic 21.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.9% | Tragic 20.6% |
Single Males | Fair 13.0% | Tragic 16.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.9% | Tragic 26.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.6% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.7% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.1% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 14.7% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Chippewa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 74.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 42.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 4.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Chippewa |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.1% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.5% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Fair 4.6% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.9% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.6% | Tragic 13.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 11.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.5% | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Chippewa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Chippewa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Tragic 63.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.4% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.6% | Exceptional 43.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.2% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 81.3% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Chippewa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 25.4%), family households with children (29.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 11.6%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 4.1%), currently married (45.0% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.20, a difference of 4.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Chippewa |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.3% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.8% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.1% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.0% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.0% | Tragic 42.6% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 15.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 3.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Chippewa |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.8% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.2% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.4% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Chippewa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 92.5%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 10.8%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (40.7% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 0.18%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Chippewa |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.1% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.9% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.5% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.9% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 86.6% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.7% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.3% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.7% | Tragic 55.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.6% | Tragic 30.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Chippewa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 49.7%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 25.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.10%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.6%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Chippewa |
Disability | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 26.1% | Tragic 27.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.2% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.3% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.6% |