Immigrants from Ecuador vs Chippewa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ecuador
Chippewa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Ecuador
Chippewa
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chippewa Integration in Immigrants from Ecuador Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,001,248 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.255. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.021% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to a decrease of 21.3 Chippewa.
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Chippewa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,722 compared to $47,015, a difference of 14.3%), median household income ($80,341 compared to $70,539, a difference of 13.9%), and per capita income ($41,195 compared to $36,631, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $53,847, a difference of 0.34%), median family income ($92,837 compared to $86,852, a difference of 6.9%), and median male earnings ($50,474 compared to $46,368, a difference of 8.9%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Chippewa |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $41,195 | Tragic $36,631 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $92,837 | Tragic $86,852 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $80,341 | Tragic $70,539 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $44,462 | Tragic $40,287 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,474 | Tragic $46,368 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,644 | Tragic $35,003 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,722 | Tragic $47,015 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $89,673 | Tragic $80,005 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $91,462 | Tragic $83,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,030 | Tragic $53,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.5% | Excellent 25.0% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Chippewa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 35.2%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 30.5%), and married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.1%), receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 5.5%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Chippewa |
Poverty | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Tragic 11.1% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.2% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 23.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.4% | Tragic 20.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 21.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.3% | Tragic 20.6% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Tragic 16.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.0% | Tragic 26.8% |
Single Fathers | Average 16.3% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.3% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.7% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 14.7% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Chippewa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 69.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 22.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.73%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.80%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Chippewa |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.9% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.8% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.5% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.9% | Tragic 13.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.2% | Tragic 11.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Chippewa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 41.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Chippewa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.7% | Tragic 63.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.0% | Exceptional 43.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.3% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.3% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.3% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.1% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.2% | Tragic 81.3% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Chippewa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 28.1%), births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 26.4%), and divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.2% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 0.070%), married-couple households (42.9% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Chippewa |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.8% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Excellent 27.7% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.9% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.3% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.8% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 33.7% | Tragic 42.6% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 152.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 78.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 60.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 18.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 41.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 60.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Chippewa |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 23.8% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 40.5% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Chippewa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 88.6%), master's degree (13.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 19.0%), and bachelor's degree (34.7% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Chippewa |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Tragic 95.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 93.7% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.3% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.4% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.1% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 87.5% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 84.8% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.0% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 58.7% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.4% | Tragic 55.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.2% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 34.7% | Tragic 30.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.8% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Chippewa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 67.8%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 61.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 56.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.1%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 5.1%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Chippewa |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.7% | Tragic 27.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.4% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.5% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Good 17.2% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Average 6.1% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |