Immigrants from Moldova vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,799,467 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Moldova communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.758. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Moldova within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.223% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Moldova corresponds to an increase of 222.7 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,489 compared to $36,631, a difference of 29.6%), median household income ($91,446 compared to $70,539, a difference of 29.6%), and median male earnings ($59,417 compared to $46,368, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 4.9%), householder income over 65 years ($62,939 compared to $53,847, a difference of 16.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($56,168 compared to $47,015, a difference of 19.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 61.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 49.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 48.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 9.4%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 102.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 50.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 5.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 16.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.3% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 56.3%), single father households (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 44.8%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.75%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (64.4% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 27.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 12.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.47%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 45.5%), professional degree (4.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 40.5%), and bachelor's degree (41.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.7% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.24%), 10th grade (94.7% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 64.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 41.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.1%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 8.3%).