Immigrants from Lithuania vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,093,417 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Lithuania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.985. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lithuania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.336% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lithuania corresponds to an increase of 336.1 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,361 compared to $36,631, a difference of 40.2%), median household income ($96,836 compared to $70,539, a difference of 37.3%), and median male earnings ($63,346 compared to $46,368, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 14.5%), householder income under 25 years ($55,028 compared to $47,015, a difference of 17.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,087 compared to $53,847, a difference of 22.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.1% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 66.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 62.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 58.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 18.9%), single father poverty (15.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 22.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 25.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 76.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 49.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 17.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 63.9%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 53.7%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.17%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (63.9% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 34.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 16.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.47%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 61.9%), professional degree (5.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 60.7%), and bachelor's degree (44.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.0% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.18%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 56.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 54.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (44.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 7.9%), cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 13.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.6%).