Immigrants from Grenada vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,960,462 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.692. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to an increase of 27.8 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 54.4%), median female earnings ($41,932 compared to $35,003, a difference of 19.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,538 compared to $47,015, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,552 compared to $83,943, a difference of 1.9%), median family income ($89,249 compared to $86,852, a difference of 2.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,747 compared to $53,847, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 36.7%), married-couple family poverty (7.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 34.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (20.7% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.11%), poverty (15.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.60%), and female poverty (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 75.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 51.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 72.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 14.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 54.3%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 17.4%), and married-couple households (37.5% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 0.90%), single mother households (8.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.20, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 296.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 176.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 136.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 44.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 99.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 136.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 68.5%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 22.3%), and bachelor's degree (35.0% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 99.1%), hearing disability (2.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 82.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 68.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.9%).