Arab vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,730,746 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Arab communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.053. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arabs within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arabs corresponds to a decrease of 0.3 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arab and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($88,398 compared to $70,539, a difference of 25.3%), per capita income ($45,662 compared to $36,631, a difference of 24.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,566 compared to $83,943, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 6.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,219 compared to $47,015, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,266 compared to $53,847, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arab and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 36.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 34.5%), and single female poverty (20.7% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arab and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 68.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 42.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arab and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 19.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arab and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 46.1%), single father households (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 45.0%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.93%), family households (64.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arab and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 25.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 13.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arab and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 46.3%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 45.5%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.7% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.060%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.6% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arab and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 54.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 38.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.9%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.7%).