Immigrants from Dominican Republic vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,567,515 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Dominican Republic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.478. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Dominican Republic within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Dominican Republic corresponds to a decrease of 3.9 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.6% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 21.5%), householder income over 65 years ($45,758 compared to $53,847, a difference of 17.7%), and median family income ($81,233 compared to $86,852, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,319 compared to $80,005, a difference of 0.39%), median household income ($70,208 compared to $70,539, a difference of 0.47%), and median male earnings ($46,655 compared to $46,368, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 54.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (20.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 53.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (18.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 1.1%), single father poverty (18.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 50.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 29.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 40.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.2% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 8.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (9.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 19.1%), single father households (2.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 18.2%), and married-couple households (37.3% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.0%), divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (31.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 232.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 131.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 106.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (68.6% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 32.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (33.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 72.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 106.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 107.8%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 19.2%), and college, under 1 year (54.0% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (30.7% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 0.41%), nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 65.3%), hearing disability (2.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 63.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age over 75 (50.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.8%).