Pennsylvania German vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,785,338 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Pennsylvania German communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.688. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pennsylvania Germans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.008% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pennsylvania Germans corresponds to an increase of 1,008.2 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (30.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 22.9%), median male earnings ($50,878 compared to $46,368, a difference of 9.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,956 compared to $83,943, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,802 compared to $35,003, a difference of 0.58%), householder income over 65 years ($52,888 compared to $53,847, a difference of 1.8%), and per capita income ($37,842 compared to $36,631, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 31.8%), male poverty (11.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 30.5%), and poverty (12.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.2% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 4.6%), single male poverty (15.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and single father poverty (20.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 37.6%), unemployment (4.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 34.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.48%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.4% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 37.2%), single father households (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 26.3%), and births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.19%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (66.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 16.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.62%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 16.7%), college, under 1 year (54.5% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 14.8%), and college, 1 year or more (48.5% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.11%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 16.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 15.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and female disability (13.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 4.4%).