Immigrants from Chile vs Chippewa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Chippewa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Chippewa
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chippewa Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,156,801 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.887. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.620% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 620.2 Chippewa.
Immigrants from Chile vs Chippewa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,213 compared to $36,631, a difference of 26.2%), median household income ($88,388 compared to $70,539, a difference of 25.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $83,943, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 3.0%), householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $47,015, a difference of 11.5%), and median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $35,003, a difference of 15.3%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Chippewa |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,213 | Tragic $36,631 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $105,655 | Tragic $86,852 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $88,388 | Tragic $70,539 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,697 | Tragic $40,287 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $55,954 | Tragic $46,368 |
Median Female Earnings | Good $40,353 | Tragic $35,003 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,440 | Tragic $47,015 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,159 | Tragic $80,005 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,412 | Tragic $83,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Excellent $62,354 | Tragic $53,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.7% | Excellent 25.0% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Chippewa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 42.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 38.0%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.5%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Chippewa |
Poverty | Average 12.2% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Average 8.9% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Average 11.1% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Average 13.3% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.4% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Excellent 13.1% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.4% | Tragic 23.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.7% | Tragic 20.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Tragic 21.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Tragic 20.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.1% | Tragic 16.4% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.1% | Tragic 26.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.4% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.3% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Good 11.5% | Tragic 14.7% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Chippewa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 82.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 46.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.78%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.92%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Chippewa |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Average 5.2% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.1% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 13.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Good 8.9% | Tragic 11.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.5% | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Chippewa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 25.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Chippewa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.9% | Tragic 63.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.8% | Exceptional 43.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.1% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 84.9% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.6% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Tragic 81.3% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Chippewa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 40.9%), births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 36.7%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (64.6% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Chippewa |
Family Households | Good 64.6% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.7% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.5% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Good 3.24 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.3% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.4% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.1% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 31.2% | Tragic 42.6% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 24.7%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 16.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 14.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Chippewa |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 11.0% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.1% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.2% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.8% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.1% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Chippewa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 51.8%), master's degree (16.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 46.9%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.1% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.49%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.67%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.67%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Chippewa |
No Schooling Completed | Fair 2.2% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Poor 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Poor 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Poor 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Poor 97.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.5% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.4% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.4% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Fair 88.9% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Average 85.9% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 66.8% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.4% | Tragic 55.7% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.0% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.8% | Tragic 30.6% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Chippewa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 47.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 46.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 46.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.2%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.7%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Chippewa |
Disability | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.1% | Tragic 27.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 17.0% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |