Scotch-Irish vs Chippewa Community Comparison

COMPARE

Scotch-Irish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Scotch-Irish

Chippewa

Average
Fair
5,433
SOCIAL INDEX
51.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
176th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chippewa Integration in Scotch-Irish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,407,191 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Scotch-Irish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.251. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scotch-Irish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.084% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scotch-Irish corresponds to an increase of 84.1 Chippewa.
Scotch-Irish Integration in Chippewa Communities

Scotch-Irish vs Chippewa Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,563 compared to $36,631, a difference of 16.2%), median male earnings ($53,658 compared to $46,368, a difference of 15.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,073 compared to $83,943, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,039 compared to $47,015, a difference of 4.3%), median female earnings ($37,383 compared to $35,003, a difference of 6.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,447 compared to $53,847, a difference of 10.4%).
Scotch-Irish vs Chippewa Income
Income MetricScotch-IrishChippewa
Per Capita Income
Fair
$42,563
Tragic
$36,631
Median Family Income
Poor
$99,591
Tragic
$86,852
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,972
Tragic
$70,539
Median Earnings
Poor
$44,924
Tragic
$40,287
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,658
Tragic
$46,368
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,383
Tragic
$35,003
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,039
Tragic
$47,015
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$89,969
Tragic
$80,005
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$97,073
Tragic
$83,943
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Poor
$59,447
Tragic
$53,847
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.5%
Excellent
25.0%

Scotch-Irish vs Chippewa Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 39.5%), male poverty (11.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 32.3%), and family poverty (8.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.4%), single mother poverty (31.5% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 10.4%), and single male poverty (14.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 11.5%).
Scotch-Irish vs Chippewa Poverty
Poverty MetricScotch-IrishChippewa
Poverty
Good
12.2%
Tragic
15.7%
Families
Excellent
8.6%
Tragic
11.2%
Males
Good
11.0%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Good
13.3%
Tragic
16.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
18.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
23.4%
Children Under 16 years
Average
16.3%
Tragic
20.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.5%
Tragic
21.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.7%
Tragic
20.6%
Single Males
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
16.4%
Single Females
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
26.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.6%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.5%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.5%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
12.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
13.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
14.7%

Scotch-Irish vs Chippewa Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 58.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 36.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 8.1%).
Scotch-Irish vs Chippewa Unemployment
Unemployment MetricScotch-IrishChippewa
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
13.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.6%
Poor
18.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
13.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
11.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
7.0%

Scotch-Irish vs Chippewa Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.3% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.41%).
Scotch-Irish vs Chippewa Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricScotch-IrishChippewa
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.3%
Tragic
63.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.3%
Tragic
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.5%
Exceptional
43.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.0%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
81.3%

Scotch-Irish vs Chippewa Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 34.3%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 31.9%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.26%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.20, a difference of 3.1%).
Scotch-Irish vs Chippewa Family Structure
Family Structure MetricScotch-IrishChippewa
Family Households
Average
64.4%
Tragic
62.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.3%
Tragic
42.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Tragic
3.1%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
8.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.7%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Tragic
42.6%

Scotch-Irish vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 38.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.0%).
Scotch-Irish vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricScotch-IrishChippewa
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.3%
Exceptional
90.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.9%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.6%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
7.6%

Scotch-Irish vs Chippewa Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 26.1%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 24.0%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.050%), 7th grade (97.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and 5th grade (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.080%).
Scotch-Irish vs Chippewa Education Level
Education Level MetricScotch-IrishChippewa
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.2%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.4%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Excellent
89.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.8%
Fair
85.2%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.4%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.9%
Tragic
55.7%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.3%
Tragic
40.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Poor
36.4%
Tragic
30.6%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.4%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.3%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.5%

Scotch-Irish vs Chippewa Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 15.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.090%), disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.0%).
Scotch-Irish vs Chippewa Disability
Disability MetricScotch-IrishChippewa
Disability
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
14.1%
Males
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
14.3%
Females
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
27.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.3%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
4.0%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.1%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%