South African vs Chippewa Community Comparison
COMPARE
South African
Chippewa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
South Africans
Chippewa
8,851
SOCIAL INDEX
86.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
44th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chippewa Integration in South African Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,251,850 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within South African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.568. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.073% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South Africans corresponds to an increase of 72.7 Chippewa.
South African vs Chippewa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between South African and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,044 compared to $36,631, a difference of 36.6%), median male earnings ($61,460 compared to $46,368, a difference of 32.6%), and median household income ($93,379 compared to $70,539, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,383 compared to $47,015, a difference of 9.3%), wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 12.2%), and median female earnings ($41,825 compared to $35,003, a difference of 19.5%).
Income Metric | South African | Chippewa |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $50,044 | Tragic $36,631 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $113,229 | Tragic $86,852 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,379 | Tragic $70,539 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,752 | Tragic $40,287 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,460 | Tragic $46,368 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,825 | Tragic $35,003 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,383 | Tragic $47,015 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $103,160 | Tragic $80,005 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $109,719 | Tragic $83,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,652 | Tragic $53,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.0% | Excellent 25.0% |
South African vs Chippewa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South African and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 47.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.2% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 44.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 11.9%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 16.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 18.3%).
Poverty Metric | South African | Chippewa |
Poverty | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Excellent 12.8% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.1% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Excellent 13.0% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Tragic 23.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 20.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 21.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Tragic 20.6% |
Single Males | Average 12.8% | Tragic 16.4% |
Single Females | Excellent 20.4% | Tragic 26.8% |
Single Fathers | Good 16.1% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Mothers | Excellent 28.5% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.6% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 14.7% |
South African vs Chippewa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South African and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 82.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 43.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.0%).
Unemployment Metric | South African | Chippewa |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.9% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Average 4.7% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.5% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 13.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 11.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 7.0% |
South African vs Chippewa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South African and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 19.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | South African | Chippewa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Good 65.3% | Tragic 63.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Average 36.7% | Exceptional 43.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.0% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.3% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Fair 82.6% | Tragic 81.3% |
South African vs Chippewa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South African and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 44.6%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 39.8%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.0%), family households (63.4% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.5%).
Family Structure Metric | South African | Chippewa |
Family Households | Tragic 63.4% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.3% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.17 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.6% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.8% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.5% | Tragic 42.6% |
South African vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South African and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 22.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 11.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.76%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 8.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | South African | Chippewa |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.0% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.2% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 7.6% |
South African vs Chippewa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between South African and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 64.3%), master's degree (18.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 58.5%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 53.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.6% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.12%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.23%).
Education Level Metric | South African | Chippewa |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.4% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.6% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.5% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.7% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.1% | Tragic 55.7% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.4% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.6% | Tragic 30.6% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.1% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
South African vs Chippewa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between South African and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 68.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 40.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 6.4%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.9%).
Disability Metric | South African | Chippewa |
Disability | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.9% | Tragic 27.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.5% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Good 2.1% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Fair 3.1% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |