Immigrants from Dominica vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,127,362 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Dominica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.557. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Dominica within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.170% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Dominica corresponds to an increase of 170.0 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 24.7%), median female earnings ($37,825 compared to $35,003, a difference of 8.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,071 compared to $53,847, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,311 compared to $83,943, a difference of 0.76%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,351 compared to $80,005, a difference of 1.7%), and median family income ($85,411 compared to $86,852, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 30.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 30.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.24%), male poverty (14.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.70%), and poverty (16.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 54.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 22.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.71%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.5% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 34.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 25.3%), single mother households (8.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and births to unmarried women (39.5% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.6%), family households (63.4% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.20, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 135.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 80.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 56.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.8% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 16.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (41.6% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 37.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 56.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 73.0%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 10.7%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (40.5% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 0.68%), nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 51.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 41.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.4%), cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.0%).