Czech vs Chippewa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Czech
Chippewa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Czechs
Chippewa
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chippewa Integration in Czech Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 206,466,934 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.168. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.031% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 31.5 Chippewa.
Czech vs Chippewa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $83,943, a difference of 23.3%), median household income ($86,164 compared to $70,539, a difference of 22.2%), and median male earnings ($56,546 compared to $46,368, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $47,015, a difference of 9.4%), median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $35,003, a difference of 11.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $53,847, a difference of 13.7%).
Income Metric | Czech | Chippewa |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,595 | Tragic $36,631 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $105,839 | Tragic $86,852 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,164 | Tragic $70,539 |
Median Earnings | Good $47,221 | Tragic $40,287 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,546 | Tragic $46,368 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,992 | Tragic $35,003 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,421 | Tragic $47,015 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,525 | Tragic $80,005 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,507 | Tragic $83,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,244 | Tragic $53,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 29.2% | Excellent 25.0% |
Czech vs Chippewa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 59.2%), family poverty (7.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 51.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.9%), single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 20.3%), and single male poverty (13.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 20.9%).
Poverty Metric | Czech | Chippewa |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.9% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.5% | Tragic 23.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.8% | Tragic 20.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Tragic 21.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Tragic 20.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 16.4% |
Single Females | Average 21.0% | Tragic 26.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.9% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.0% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.0% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 14.7% |
Czech vs Chippewa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 75.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 54.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 50.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 15.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Czech | Chippewa |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.3% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.7% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.6% | Tragic 13.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 11.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Czech vs Chippewa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Czech | Chippewa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Tragic 63.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.6% | Exceptional 43.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 78.5% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.5% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.3% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.9% | Tragic 81.3% |
Czech vs Chippewa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 41.3%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 39.6%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.11 compared to 3.20, a difference of 3.0%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households (64.5% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Czech | Chippewa |
Family Households | Good 64.5% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.5% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.4% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Good 2.3% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.9% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 11.9% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.5% | Tragic 42.6% |
Czech vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 37.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 2.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Czech | Chippewa |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.9% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 93.3% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 61.5% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.5% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Czech vs Chippewa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 29.0%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 26.1%), and bachelor's degree (38.0% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (97.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.030%), 5th grade (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and 4th grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.060%).
Education Level Metric | Czech | Chippewa |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.2% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.6% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.1% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.1% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.6% | Tragic 55.7% |
Associate's Degree | Good 47.2% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Average 38.0% | Tragic 30.6% |
Master's Degree | Average 14.7% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.4% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Tragic 1.5% |
Czech vs Chippewa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 32.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 23.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 6.1%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 10.3%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 13.4%).
Disability Metric | Czech | Chippewa |
Disability | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Average 11.3% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.4% | Tragic 27.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.7% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.4% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |