Native Hawaiian vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,588,290 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.196. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 4.6 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $53,847, a difference of 31.9%), median household income ($89,919 compared to $70,539, a difference of 27.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $83,943, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 1.8%), median female earnings ($38,461 compared to $35,003, a difference of 9.9%), and median earnings ($45,027 compared to $40,287, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 45.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.2% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 44.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 14.5%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.5%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 19.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 63.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 39.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 17.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 30.3%), births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 24.3%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.5%), average family size (3.43 compared to 3.20, a difference of 7.1%), and family households (68.4% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 24.0%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 22.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 9.7%), bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 8.7%), and master's degree (12.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 39.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 36.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.19%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 8.2%).