Immigrants from the Azores vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,520,533 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from the Azores communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.390. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from the Azores within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.030% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from the Azores corresponds to an increase of 30.3 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,322 compared to $80,005, a difference of 15.4%), median male earnings ($53,503 compared to $46,368, a difference of 15.4%), and median household income ($80,357 compared to $70,539, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($52,121 compared to $53,847, a difference of 3.3%), per capita income ($39,608 compared to $36,631, a difference of 8.1%), and wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.7% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 55.3%), single male poverty (13.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 24.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.9% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and single mother poverty (32.2% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 44.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 22.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.9%), male unemployment (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.1% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.8% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 9.5%), births to unmarried women (39.6% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and married-couple households (45.2% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.27%), currently married (45.1% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.29%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.26%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 85.9%), professional degree (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 22.7%), and college, 1 year or more (48.4% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 18.9%), self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.0%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (14.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.10%), ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.17%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.0%).