Mongolian vs Chippewa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Mongolian
Chippewa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Mongolians
Chippewa
8,008
SOCIAL INDEX
77.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
93rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chippewa Integration in Mongolian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,162,591 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Mongolian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.164. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mongolians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mongolians corresponds to an increase of 20.9 Chippewa.
Mongolian vs Chippewa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,173 compared to $36,631, a difference of 34.2%), median household income ($93,971 compared to $70,539, a difference of 33.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,602 compared to $83,943, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 6.6%), householder income under 25 years ($52,540 compared to $47,015, a difference of 11.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,326 compared to $53,847, a difference of 21.3%).
Income Metric | Mongolian | Chippewa |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $49,173 | Tragic $36,631 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $114,553 | Tragic $86,852 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,971 | Tragic $70,539 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $51,038 | Tragic $40,287 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $60,350 | Tragic $46,368 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,542 | Tragic $35,003 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,540 | Tragic $47,015 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,578 | Tragic $80,005 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,602 | Tragic $83,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,326 | Tragic $53,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.6% | Excellent 25.0% |
Mongolian vs Chippewa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 45.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 40.7%), and receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 6.7%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 11.7%).
Poverty Metric | Mongolian | Chippewa |
Poverty | Average 12.4% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Excellent 8.6% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Fair 11.3% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Average 13.4% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.1% | Tragic 23.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.2% | Tragic 20.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 21.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.4% | Tragic 20.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 16.4% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.2% | Tragic 26.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.3% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.7% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Good 5.0% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 10.9% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Average 12.2% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 14.7% |
Mongolian vs Chippewa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 105.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 48.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 6.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Mongolian | Chippewa |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.9% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Average 5.1% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.6% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 13.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.4% | Tragic 11.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Mongolian vs Chippewa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 24.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Mongolian | Chippewa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.1% | Tragic 63.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 79.9% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.3% | Exceptional 43.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.3% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.3% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.3% | Tragic 81.3% |
Mongolian vs Chippewa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 52.7%), single father households (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 50.7%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.070%), family households (62.8% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Mongolian | Chippewa |
Family Households | Tragic 62.8% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.3% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.4% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 42.6% |
Mongolian vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 38.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 30.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 18.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Mongolian | Chippewa |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 87.0% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.8% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Mongolian vs Chippewa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 81.0%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 76.9%), and master's degree (19.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 69.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.9% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.22%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.8% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.27%), and 11th grade (93.0% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.56%).
Education Level Metric | Mongolian | Chippewa |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Fair 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Fair 97.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Average 97.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Average 96.0% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Average 95.8% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Good 95.0% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Good 94.0% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Excellent 93.0% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.8% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 89.9% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.0% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.9% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.8% | Tragic 55.7% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 53.0% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 45.4% | Tragic 30.6% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.4% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 1.5% |
Mongolian vs Chippewa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 64.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 47.8%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.1%).
Disability Metric | Mongolian | Chippewa |
Disability | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.8% | Tragic 27.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.7% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |