Ecuadorian vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,660,226 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.247. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 13.9 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($82,070 compared to $70,539, a difference of 16.4%), householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $47,015, a difference of 14.7%), and per capita income ($41,958 compared to $36,631, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $53,847, a difference of 2.1%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 9.0%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $86,852, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 35.5%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 31.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 1.3%), family poverty (10.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 68.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 23.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 39.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 29.5%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 28.1%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.6% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 0.83%), married-couple households (43.5% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.20, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 140.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 69.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 16.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 36.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 53.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 80.6%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 22.6%), and bachelor's degree (35.4% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 71.9%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 59.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 54.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.2%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 5.0%).