Guatemalan vs Chippewa Community Comparison

COMPARE

Guatemalan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Guatemalans

Chippewa

Poor
Fair
1,497
SOCIAL INDEX
12.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
305th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chippewa Integration in Guatemalan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,056,978 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.262. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to an increase of 2.8 Chippewa.
Guatemalan Integration in Chippewa Communities

Guatemalan vs Chippewa Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.6% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 10.4%), householder income under 25 years ($51,525 compared to $47,015, a difference of 9.6%), and median household income ($75,961 compared to $70,539, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($46,736 compared to $46,368, a difference of 0.79%), householder income over 65 years ($54,526 compared to $53,847, a difference of 1.3%), and median family income ($88,295 compared to $86,852, a difference of 1.7%).
Guatemalan vs Chippewa Income
Income MetricGuatemalanChippewa
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,766
Tragic
$36,631
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,295
Tragic
$86,852
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,961
Tragic
$70,539
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,205
Tragic
$40,287
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,736
Tragic
$46,368
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,695
Tragic
$35,003
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,525
Tragic
$47,015
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,331
Tragic
$80,005
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,705
Tragic
$83,943
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,526
Tragic
$53,847
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.6%
Excellent
25.0%

Guatemalan vs Chippewa Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 29.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 25.2%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.030%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.86%), and receiving food stamps (14.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 1.8%).
Guatemalan vs Chippewa Poverty
Poverty MetricGuatemalanChippewa
Poverty
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
15.7%
Families
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
11.2%
Males
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
16.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
18.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
23.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.2%
Tragic
20.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Tragic
21.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.4%
Tragic
20.6%
Single Males
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
16.4%
Single Females
Tragic
23.8%
Tragic
26.8%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.6%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.9%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.0%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
12.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
13.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
14.7%

Guatemalan vs Chippewa Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 54.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 29.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.2%).
Guatemalan vs Chippewa Unemployment
Unemployment MetricGuatemalanChippewa
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
13.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.6%
Poor
18.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.9%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.2%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
13.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
11.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
7.0%

Guatemalan vs Chippewa Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 23.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.92%).
Guatemalan vs Chippewa Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricGuatemalanChippewa
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Tragic
63.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Tragic
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.5%
Exceptional
43.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.3%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.7%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.0%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.2%
Tragic
81.3%

Guatemalan vs Chippewa Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 14.9%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 8.3%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (42.9% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 0.75%), married-couple households (43.3% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 4.1%).
Guatemalan vs Chippewa Family Structure
Family Structure MetricGuatemalanChippewa
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Tragic
62.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.9%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.3%
Tragic
42.1%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.40
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
3.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
8.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.9%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.2%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.1%
Tragic
42.6%

Guatemalan vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 16.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 8.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.2%).
Guatemalan vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricGuatemalanChippewa
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.0%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Exceptional
90.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
54.1%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.1%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
7.6%

Guatemalan vs Chippewa Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 111.5%), college, under 1 year (56.8% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 10.2%), and high school diploma (82.0% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 0.010%), bachelor's degree (31.0% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.0%).
Guatemalan vs Chippewa Education Level
Education Level MetricGuatemalanChippewa
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
94.2%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Exceptional
97.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
89.9%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
87.9%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
86.4%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.6%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.0%
Excellent
89.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
78.5%
Fair
85.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
56.8%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.2%
Tragic
55.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.5%
Tragic
40.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
30.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.5%

Guatemalan vs Chippewa Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 53.5%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 42.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.8%).
Guatemalan vs Chippewa Disability
Disability MetricGuatemalanChippewa
Disability
Good
11.6%
Tragic
14.1%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
14.3%
Females
Good
12.1%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.7%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.5%
Tragic
27.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.0%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
4.0%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%