Croatian vs Chippewa Community Comparison

COMPARE

Croatian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Croatians

Chippewa

Excellent
Fair
8,930
SOCIAL INDEX
86.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
37th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chippewa Integration in Croatian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,086,441 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Croatian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.488. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Croatians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.495% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Croatians corresponds to an increase of 495.0 Chippewa.
Croatian Integration in Chippewa Communities

Croatian vs Chippewa Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Croatian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,742 compared to $36,631, a difference of 30.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,383 compared to $83,943, a difference of 29.1%), and median male earnings ($59,715 compared to $46,368, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,662 compared to $47,015, a difference of 9.9%), wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 16.1%), and median female earnings ($40,993 compared to $35,003, a difference of 17.1%).
Croatian vs Chippewa Income
Income MetricCroatianChippewa
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,742
Tragic
$36,631
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$111,370
Tragic
$86,852
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,685
Tragic
$70,539
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$49,724
Tragic
$40,287
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$59,715
Tragic
$46,368
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,993
Tragic
$35,003
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,662
Tragic
$47,015
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$102,414
Tragic
$80,005
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,383
Tragic
$83,943
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,225
Tragic
$53,847
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.0%
Excellent
25.0%

Croatian vs Chippewa Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Croatian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 53.4%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 53.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.4% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 52.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 9.9%), single mother poverty (28.2% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 23.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 24.4%).
Croatian vs Chippewa Poverty
Poverty MetricCroatianChippewa
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
15.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
11.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
16.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
18.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
23.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
20.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.0%
Tragic
21.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Tragic
20.6%
Single Males
Average
12.8%
Tragic
16.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.7%
Tragic
26.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
12.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
13.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
14.7%

Croatian vs Chippewa Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Croatian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 77.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 47.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 5.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.0%).
Croatian vs Chippewa Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCroatianChippewa
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
13.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Poor
18.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.4%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.6%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Tragic
13.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.8%
Tragic
11.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
7.0%

Croatian vs Chippewa Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Croatian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.1% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.7%).
Croatian vs Chippewa Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCroatianChippewa
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.7%
Tragic
63.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.1%
Exceptional
43.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.2%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.8%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Tragic
81.3%

Croatian vs Chippewa Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Croatian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 46.2%), single father households (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 45.6%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (63.8% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.20, a difference of 3.3%).
Croatian vs Chippewa Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCroatianChippewa
Family Households
Tragic
63.8%
Tragic
62.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
42.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
8.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.2%
Tragic
42.6%

Croatian vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Croatian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 16.0%), no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 14.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.6%).
Croatian vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCroatianChippewa
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.9%
Exceptional
90.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.6%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
7.6%

Croatian vs Chippewa Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Croatian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 43.5%), professional degree (4.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 41.8%), and bachelor's degree (40.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.080%), 4th grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and 5th grade (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.080%).
Croatian vs Chippewa Education Level
Education Level MetricCroatianChippewa
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.5%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Excellent
89.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.8%
Fair
85.2%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.3%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.2%
Tragic
55.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
40.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.6%
Tragic
30.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
1.5%

Croatian vs Chippewa Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Croatian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 35.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 27.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 6.0%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 10.5%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.1%).
Croatian vs Chippewa Disability
Disability MetricCroatianChippewa
Disability
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
14.1%
Males
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
14.3%
Females
Fair
12.4%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.7%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.0%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.8%
Tragic
27.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.7%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
4.0%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%