Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,398,726 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.573. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.130% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to an increase of 129.8 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($78,682 compared to $70,539, a difference of 11.5%), wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and median earnings ($43,998 compared to $40,287, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $47,015, a difference of 3.7%), householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $53,847, a difference of 6.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,736 compared to $80,005, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 24.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 20.1%), and single female poverty (22.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (19.7% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 5.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and family poverty (10.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 81.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 52.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 47.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.96%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 29.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 27.6%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 0.80%), currently married (44.3% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 21.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 14.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 92.2%), master's degree (13.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 18.4%), and bachelor's degree (35.5% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (62.5% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 0.21%), college, 1 year or more (56.6% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 66.7%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 36.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.84%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.4%).