Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,315,341 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.389. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to a decrease of 3.1 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($106,057 compared to $70,539, a difference of 50.3%), median male earnings ($68,960 compared to $46,368, a difference of 48.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($124,188 compared to $83,943, a difference of 47.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 17.4%), householder income under 25 years ($57,818 compared to $47,015, a difference of 23.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,103 compared to $53,847, a difference of 30.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.3% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 76.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 67.6%), and receiving food stamps (8.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 66.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 14.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 25.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 26.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 101.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 59.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 26.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 72.7%), single father households (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 57.3%), and single mother households (5.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 47.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.86%), family households (66.4% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and family households with children (30.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 23.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 11.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.89%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (20.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 81.4%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 72.4%), and professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 70.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.6% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.15%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.50%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 82.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 68.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 58.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 5.3%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 10.5%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.6%).