Immigrants from Asia vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,138,703 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.131. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to a decrease of 0.6 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($99,933 compared to $70,539, a difference of 41.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,566 compared to $83,943, a difference of 38.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,787 compared to $80,005, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 8.0%), householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $47,015, a difference of 19.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,594 compared to $53,847, a difference of 25.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 62.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 55.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 50.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 6.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 96.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 50.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 28.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 59.2%), single father households (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 48.2%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.1%), family households (66.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and family households with children (28.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 15.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 61.3%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 59.1%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 58.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.26%), high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.52%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 77.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 57.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.0%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.8%).